People - Capability Maturity Model
By Dan Zrymiak
Overview:
Every employee in a
company has an impact on the quality of the product or service. It is imperative that the level of employee
development reflects the quality expectations placed on each and every
employee. Since well-trained and
competent employees are a strategic advantage for a company, it is sensible for
a company to take a strategic approach to their training activities.
The People Capability
Maturity Model (P-CMM) was developed by the Software Engineering Institute
(SEI) of Carnegie-Mellon University in Pennsylvania. The SEI collaborated with representatives from industry, government,
military, and academic organizations to develop an evolutionary model intended
to develop and optimize employee training and competence in organizations.
Maturity Levels:
The P-CMM defines
success in terms of an organization’s “maturity”. The structure of the P-CMM demonstrates how an organization can
progress sequentially through increasing levels of maturity to a summit of
optimal performance. There are five
defined maturity levels in the P-CMM:
1. Initial:
No processes initiated.
2. Repeatable:
Processes focus on establishing basic workforce practices
and eliminating problems that hinder work performance. The intent is to instill basic discipline
into workforce activities.
3. Defined:
Processes address organizational issues, as the organization
tailors its defined workforce practices to the core competencies required by
its business environment. The intent is
to identify primary competencies and align workforce activities with these
competencies.
4. Managed:
Processes focus on building competency-based teams and
establishing a quantitative understanding of trends in the development of
knowledge and skills and in the alignment of performance across different
levels of the organization. The intent
is to quantitiatively manage organizational growth in workforce capabilities
and establish competency-based teams.
5. Optimizing:
Processes
cover issues that both the organization and individuals must address in
implementing continuous improvements in their capability. The intent is to continuously improve
methods for developing personal and organizational competence.
Themes:
There are
relationships which link the maturity levels so that progress can occur on a
set path. Through these themes, the
implementation of processes at one maturity level can serve as a foundation for
practices and capabilities at a higher level.
The Themes of the P-CMM are:
1. Developing Capabilities:
The trend starts with identifying current training needs within a unit, progresses to the identification of core competencies developed by the organization, and evolves to having individuals being able to establish their own program of professional development.
2. Building Teams and Culture:
The trend in building teams and culture begins with establishing basic communication skills, grows to developing a participatory culture, and continues on into formal team-building and continuous improvement of team capabilities.
3. Motivating and Managing Performance:
The trend in motivating and managing performance begins with establishing basic performance management and compensation practices, then improves these practices through adaptation to competency development and team building. From this level, the trend optimizes by looking for constant sources of innovation.
4. Shaping The Workforce:
The trend in shaping
the workforce begins with establishing basic staffing practices, grows to
developing plans for workforce development, sets and tracks objectives for
competencies in the workforce, and then looks for constant sources of
innovation.
Key Process Areas:
Key Process Areas
refer to the particular tasks and activities which must be completed in order
for an organization to gain maturity and progress towards optimizing their
training initiatives. The following
matrix identifies the appropriate Key Process Areas necessary to address each
of the four themes of the P-CMM, and allow the organization to mature.
|
Maturity
Levels |
Process Categories |
|||
|
|
THEME 1:Developing Capabilities |
THEME 2: Building
Teams and Culture |
THEME 3: Motivating
and managing performance |
THEME 4: Shaping the
workforce |
|
MATURITY
LEVEL 5: Optimizing |
Coaching Personal Competency Development |
Continuous Workforce Innovation |
||
|
MATURITY
LEVEL 4: Managed |
Mentoring |
Team Building |
Organizational Performance Alignment Team-Based Practices |
Organizational Competency Management |
|
MATURITY
LEVEL 3: Defined |
Competency Development Knowledge and Skills Analysis |
Participatory Culture |
Competency-Based Practices Career Development |
Workforce Planning |
|
MATURITY
LEVEL 2: Repeatable |
Training Communication |
Communication |
Compensation Performance Management Work Environment |
Staffing |
|
MATURITY
LEVEL 1: Initial |
|
|
|
|
Implementation:
The implementation of
the People Capability Maturity Model (P-CMM) requires support and approval from
the different areas of an organization.
This model will not be effective if it is imposed or forced on department. Since the model is generic in nature, it has
to be interpreted and customized in order to make it appropriate to the nature
of the company or organization.
This model was
designed to impart benefits at every maturity level. It does not benefit an organization to skip a level, or to disregard
the processes characteristic of an early maturity level. The outputs of each level serve as the
foundation for the practices of subsequent maturity levels. This is best described through the four
themes of the model.
To aid with the
interpretation and the implementation of this model in an organization, the
P-CMM has identified the following acceptance criteria for each Key Process
Area:
-
Goals;
-
Commitments to
perform;
-
Abilities to perform;
-
Activities performed;
-
Measurement and
analysis
-
Verification of
implementation
As an example, this
is the breakdown for Key Process Area: Training
|
Goals |
Commitments
To Perform |
Abilities To
Perform |
Activities
Performed |
Measurement
and Analysis |
Verification
of Implementation |
|
Training in the
critical skills required in each unit is provided. |
The organization
follows a documented policy for its training activities. |
Within each unit,
an individual(s) is assigned responsibility for ensuring that training
activities are conducted. |
Critical skills
required for performing critical tasks are identified in each unit. |
Measurements are
made and used to determine the status of training activities within each
unit. |
A responsible
individual(s) verifies that training activities are conducted according to
the unit’s plan and the organization’s documented policies. |
|
Individuals receive
timely training that is needed to perform their assignments. |
An organizational
role(s) is assigned responsibility for assisting and advising units on
training activities. |
Adequate resources
and funding are provided for implementing the planned training activities. |
The training needs
for each unit are identified. |
Unit measures of
training status are collected and aggregated at the organizational level. |
Executive
management periodically reviews the organization’s training activities to
determine if they comply with its documented policies. |
|
Training
opportunities are made available to all individuals. |
|
Training time is
made available to each individual according to the organization’s training
policy. |
Each unit develops
and maintains a plan for satisfying its training needs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Individuals
responsible for identifying training needs are trained in methods relevant to
their responsibilities. |
Individuals and/or
groups receive the training they need to perform their assigned tasks. |
|
|
|
|
|
Individuals
developing or providing training have the necessary training and/or
experience required to perform their responsibilities. |
Relevant training
opportunities are identified and made available to support each individual’s
development. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Training is tracked
against the unit’s training plan. |
|
|
In order to aid in
the implementation and The P-CMM provides similar descriptions for each Key
Process Area in a thorough and detailed manner. The application of this system is intended as a guideline for
organizations.
The development of
employees into productive and strategic assets is a worthwhile initiative that
can bestow great rewards for a company or organization. To achieve these rewards, a company should
examine the various processes and activities outlined in the P-CMM, and
determine an applicable and appropriate strategy to optimize employee
performance. The P-CMM is free and
available over the internet at the following link.
ftp://ftp.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/95.reports/pdf/mm002.95.pdf
Having read through
this document several times, I am astonished at the vast potential that
organizations have for improvement and optimization. Standards and practices such as ISO 9001 and Total Quality
Management address only the basic features of this employee development
program. As professionals, it is our
obligation to familiarize ourselves with the extensive opportunities for
expanding the capabilities and performance of our organizations.
Dan
Zrymiak is a Senior Member of the American Society for Quality, presently
serving as the Region 4 Deputy Regional Councilor for the ASQ Software Division.
Dan has previously served as Chair of the Programs Committee and Chair of
the Marketing Committee on the Board of Section 0408 in Vancouver, Canada.